Nomi Malone, the heroine of Paul Verhoeven's masterfully campy Showgirls, is a recovering prostitute looking for home in glitzy Las Vegas. Her years on the streets have left their mark. She's a stray dog who's been whipped so often that she no longer has the good sense to stay away from trouble. When danger rears its head she lunges, teeth (and switch-blade, and acrylic nails) flashing without thinking twice. And even then she comes slinking back, ass wiggling, smile as wide as Nevada, trying to make her abusers love her.
Nomi Malone is not a human. Neither our writer, our director nor Elizabeth Berkeley herself bring a single drop of humanity to this role. Nomi Malone is an animal, caged and furious. No, even that's not quite right. She's an elemental spirit, fire leaping from her eyes as she flings a plate of french fries with all the fury of Medea slaying her children.
She arrives in Las Vegas, a place that has no use for humanity, as evidenced by the brutality inflicted on Nomi's roommate, a seamstress who is the film's only good character. Here, she rises to power the old-fashioned way. She fucks, fights and sabotages her way from doing lap dances at the Cheetah to erupting from a plaster volcano wearing nothing but some sequins and a g-string. Along the way she eats some quesadillas and infamously buys an ugly, slutty "Ver-sayse" dress. Then she eats some chips.
The climax of Nomi's rapid rise to success is, of course, the moment she erupts from that volcano while a voice intones, "Nomi Malone is Goddess!" Please pay close attention, friends. She is not a goddess who slithers out of the sea, or flies to Earth on angel's wings. Nomi Malone explodes out of the very bowels of the Earth. It's the old elemental fury again. Nomi was born to be Goddess.
But Nomi Malone was born Polly Ann Costello. This, of course, gives us what passes for a witty joke in Eszterhas's typewriter, when the show's director says Nomi looks like "Pollyanna." We'll forget for a moment that the joke isn't funny and that Nomi looks like, well, a stripper and not Pollyanna, because the name change is more significant than one stupid joke.
Remember RoboCop? In this earlier masterpiece, Verhoeven explores the exisential problem of Being in the form of a cyborg cop. Gunned down in the line of duty, our hero is transformed into a ruthless, mindless creature driven only to enforce the law. But something deep in him, the last twitching remnants of organic matter, rebel. Memories of his former life begin to emerge. The soul cannot be killed even by positronic brains and pistol holsters embedded in one's thigh. Being the best cop he can be requires RoboCop to give up his natural human existence, something he can never entirely do.
The persistence of memory, eternal recurrence, and identity form the backdrop for several great Verhoeven films (the other that comes to mind is, of course, Total Recall.) And while Verhoeven has certainly made better films than Showgirls, it is no less interested in these profound existential ideas. Polly Ann Costello leaves her life behind and becomes Nomi Malone, transforming from a whore into a whore who dances just as Alex Murphy dies and is transformed from a cop into a cop with a really cool computerized visor.
In the end, Nomi Malone exacts ferocious revenge in the film's most spectacular scene, in which her spastic dancing mutates into spastic karate in high heels. Then she flees, back to where she started, pulling her blade on unsuspecting truck drivers on the interstate. Nomi Malone has to travel all the way to the volcanos of Las Vegas to learn what we always knew: a goddess can't be contained on stage. A streetwalking shit-kicker can't be tamed like Eliza Doolittle. Nomi's too big for Vegas. So it's back the streets, the only place that knows what to do with her fury.
And in so many ways, this is the story of Showgirls itself. A film too big to be contained on a the big screen, it has become an object of obsession on the small screen. We huddle around our TV's to laugh and mock and quote and salivate, hearts thumping in time to Nomi's dolphinfucking, worshipping this most alluring, powerful and dangerous of godesses.
It's as true now as it was then. Nomi Malone is Goddess!
[An entry in the Showgirls Blog Orgy. Check out: Ben, Tim and Girish. And: David, Flickhead, Long Pauses, Zach and Brian . . . running log of futue posts will probably be at Girish's blog, so keep your eyes out!]
Great post, Joshua!
ReplyDelete"She's an elemental spirit, fire leaping from her eyes as she flings a plate of french fries with all the fury of Medea slaying her children."
Perfect!!
Terrific analysis of a truly misunderstood film.
ReplyDeleteIt amazes me how many of "Showgirls" fans seem to think its genius is accidental, unintentional somehow...you're one of the first I've seen debunk that notion in print.
Regarding Nomi Malone as "animal," notice that her favorite food--other than fries/chips--appears to be greasy, sloppy hamburgers, so well ketchupped they may as well be raw slabs of bloody cow flank, and that she devours these hamburgers with all the daintiness of a half-starved hyena. "Showgirls" is the only rise-to-the-top movie I can think of where, when our heroine takes to the roof of her car to gaze down tearfully on the city she plans to conquer, she's got what appears to be a half-eaten Whopper in one claw. Misty, yearning music plays as she half-consciously, tearfully, keeps eating her burger. It's nuts.
Bob, don't forget about the Cheetah iconography.
ReplyDeleteJoshy, an excellent post. I esp. love the "exploding out of the bowels" line.
Happy Showgirls Blog Orgy Day.
Man, Bob, you just referenced my very favorite scene! Watching her eat that burger is like nothing ever caught on film. And I love her food obsession -- it may be a heavy-handed metaphor for her hunger but it's so relentless and perfect.
ReplyDeleteI know! It's amazing...especially because there is something so gross and unfeminine about it...like, this woman is supposed to be the object of male lust, but she's such a foul, carnivorous beast.
ReplyDeleteNot to take it too far, but...every time you see her wolfing down food, you're compelled to imagine the unladylike size of her subsequent BMs.
Or, well, at least I feel so compelled.
I love that comparison between the past-life structure of RoboCop and that of Showgirls! Anyone still in doubt about Paul Verhoeven's relevance as an autuer? I thought not.
ReplyDeleteThough I still don't quite see how Hollow Man fits into things.
Hey Joshua, great character analysis. You've got the love.
ReplyDeleteNot to take it too far, but...every time you see her wolfing down food, you're compelled to imagine the unladylike size of her subsequent BMs.
Haha! I'm ashamed to say that the thought never occurred to me. Such thoughts typically occur to me.
You are onto something with "transforming from a whore into a whore who dances just as Alex Murphy dies and is transformed from a cop into a cop with a really cool computerized visor". In SPETTERS, the leading lady goes from a vendor of croquettes in a trailer to a vendor of croquettes in a restaurant. In TOTAL RECALL, Arnie goes from dreaming about being a secret agent to actually being one. In HOLLOW MAN, Kevin Bacon goes from an asshole studying invisibility to a bigger, invisible asshole. It applies to all of the characters in BASIC INSTINCT. I never really thought about it before, but Verhoeven's characters never change, even though their circumstances do.
ReplyDeleteBeautifully written! But I thought her Versace dress was gorgeous!
ReplyDeletexo,
Kevin
It's interesting to discuss this work in the context of Verhoeven's body of work. The transformation issues (or lacktherof) are pounded in throughout the film. But I honestly never looked into his treatment of memory.
ReplyDeleteOne thing I will say about his films is that he has a tendancy to polarize the sexes in his films set in present day (SHOWGIRLS, BASIC INSTINCT, TURKISH DELIGHT etc) and there seems to be some kind of an effort towards bridging the social gender gap in many of his futuristic films. In ROBOCOP and STARSHIP TROOPERS we have the infamous locker room sequences and scenes where women are playing as roughly as the boys.
I find the film itself to be genius and in the context of his body of work I think it's obvious that it wasn't a mistake. The one thing that was out of Verhoeven's control in this film was the social reaction and subsequent rise of this film to cult infamy.
But the debate continues today. Is it art or is it a joke? Call me absurd, but I find genius in this film and many of his other films (I don't know what to say about HOLLOW MAN, however) just as Haynes and Fassbinder rediscovered and were able to recontextualize Sirk's melodramas.
I fucking love Showgirls more than life itself. This is a beautiful analysis.
ReplyDelete